Overview
Whether you arrived from a “Shuffle vs MultiversX” query or from PEPS coin pages, this hub aggregates ranks, performance and module-backed signals into one canonical URL.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | SHFL | EGLD |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.269618 | $2.68 |
| Market Cap | $114.60M | $81.52M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $1.45M | $1.86M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 237.00 | 288.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | SHFL | EGLD |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -10.10% | -0.10% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | SHFL | EGLD |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
When RSI and trend disagree across Shuffle and MultiversX, expect choppy relative performance until one side reclaims a clear structure.
Fundamentals
| Metric | SHFL | EGLD |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Shuffle
MultiversX
Pros and cons
Pros of Shuffle
- Composite PEPS readings for Shuffle can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Shuffle has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- SHFL often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
Cons of Shuffle
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit Shuffle harder simply because it is more visible.
- When dominance narratives fade, Shuffle can lag hotter rotation names.
- Indicator stacks on Shuffle may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
Pros of MultiversX
- Narrative optionality around MultiversX can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- Diversifying versus Shuffle with MultiversX can change portfolio factor exposure.
- MultiversX can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Active volume bursts on EGLD sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
Cons of MultiversX
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave MultiversX more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Higher volatility on EGLD cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
Which looks stronger right now?
The “stronger” label here is descriptive, not predictive. Shuffle and MultiversX can alternate leadership as macro liquidity and narrative rotate.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. Shuffle holds market-cap $114.60M and rank #237; MultiversX shows $81.52M and #288. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch MultiversX. Where durability matters, watch Shuffle. AI composite scores (56.80/56.80) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, Shuffle or MultiversX?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Shuffle leads on market cap today, while MultiversX leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, SHFL or EGLD?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Shuffle and MultiversX.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. MultiversX currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is MultiversX, but longer windows can disagree.