Overview
PEPS ranks this pair inside the Top 300 market-cap universe. That means Cardano and Derive are liquid enough for an indexable comparison, with metrics refreshed on the hourly coin pipeline.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | ADA | DRV |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.189700 | $0.098511 |
| Market Cap | $6.18B | $98.48M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $44.75M | $1.67M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 16.00 | 258.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +5.18% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | ADA | DRV |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +8.65% | -6.30% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | ADA | DRV |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 56.73 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 0.01 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 12.34 | 21.33 |
| Support | 0.15 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 0.26 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | neutral | bearish |
| Momentum | — | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
When RSI and trend disagree across Cardano and Derive, expect choppy relative performance until one side reclaims a clear structure.
Fundamentals
| Metric | ADA | DRV |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | 0.00 | — |
| Github activity | 3,757.00 | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Cardano
Derive
Pros and cons
Pros of Cardano
- Composite PEPS readings for Cardano can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Cardano has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- Cardano typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
Cons of Cardano
- When dominance narratives fade, Cardano can lag hotter rotation names.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit Cardano harder simply because it is more visible.
- Crowded positioning around ADA sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Large-cap status for Cardano can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
Pros of Derive
- Diversifying versus Cardano with Derive can change portfolio factor exposure.
- Active volume bursts on DRV sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- PEPS tracking for Derive still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
Cons of Derive
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave Derive more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
Which looks stronger right now?
The “stronger” label here is descriptive, not predictive. Cardano and Derive can alternate leadership as macro liquidity and narrative rotate.
AI summary
PEPS synthesizes module output into a readable pair brief. Headline stats put Cardano at $0.189700 and Derive at $0.098511. Relative performance over 24h (Cardano) is a short window. Pair it with 30d/1y rows before inferring regime change. Return to related comparisons and individual coin intelligence pages to validate whether the relative story still holds after fresh prints.
FAQ
Which is better, Cardano or Derive?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Cardano leads on market cap today, while Cardano leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, ADA or DRV?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Cardano and Derive.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Cardano currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Cardano, but longer windows can disagree.