Overview
PEPS ranks this pair inside the Top 300 market-cap universe. That means Tether and Cosmos Hub are liquid enough for an indexable comparison, with metrics refreshed on the hourly coin pipeline.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | USDT | ATOM |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.999113 | $1.27 |
| Market Cap | $184.03B | $723.29M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $23.84B | $1.46M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 3.00 | 85.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +4.22% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | USDT | ATOM |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.01% | +3.35% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | USDT | ATOM |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 18.97 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 0.05 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 51.19 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | — |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1.61 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | — |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
When RSI and trend disagree across Tether and Cosmos Hub, expect choppy relative performance until one side reclaims a clear structure.
Fundamentals
| Metric | USDT | ATOM |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Github activity | 0.00 | 1,299.00 |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Tether
Cosmos Hub
Pros and cons
Pros of Tether
- Tether has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- Higher ranking for Tether can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- USDT often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
Cons of Tether
- When dominance narratives fade, Tether can lag hotter rotation names.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- Large-cap status for Tether can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
Pros of Cosmos Hub
- Diversifying versus Tether with Cosmos Hub can change portfolio factor exposure.
- Cosmos Hub can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
Cons of Cosmos Hub
- Trend failures on Cosmos Hub often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for Cosmos Hub.
- Relative underperformance versus Tether can persist through entire market regimes.
Which looks stronger right now?
The “stronger” label here is descriptive, not predictive. Tether and Cosmos Hub can alternate leadership as macro liquidity and narrative rotate.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: Tether (USDT) trades near $0.999113 with a +0.01% day move, while Cosmos Hub (ATOM) is around $1.27 (+3.35%). Volume leadership currently sits with Tether, and market-cap leadership with Tether. Technical trend labels read bearish vs bearish, with RSI near 49.02/18.97. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, Tether or Cosmos Hub?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Tether leads on market cap today, while Cosmos Hub leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, USDT or ATOM?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Tether and Cosmos Hub.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Tether currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Cosmos Hub, but longer windows can disagree.