Overview
From a portfolio lens, Chainlink ($6.30B) and BEAT ($1.03B) offer different beta to bitcoin cycles. The overview below keeps the facts first and the narrative second.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | LINK | BEAT |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $8.40 | $1,887.28 |
| Market Cap | $6.30B | $1.03B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $9.93M | $37.47M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 19.00 | 65.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +4.13% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | LINK | BEAT |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +4.06% | -23.00% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | LINK | BEAT |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 45.39 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 0.33 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 14.96 | 21.33 |
| Support | 8.20 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 8.73 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | neutral | bearish |
| Momentum | — | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, Chainlink shows RSI 45.39 with trend bias neutral, while BEAT sits at RSI 49.02 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | LINK | BEAT |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | 87.00 | — |
| Github activity | 5,703.00 | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Chainlink
BEAT
Pros and cons
Pros of Chainlink
- Higher ranking for Chainlink can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- Composite PEPS readings for Chainlink can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Chainlink typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
Cons of Chainlink
- Large-cap status for Chainlink can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- When dominance narratives fade, Chainlink can lag hotter rotation names.
- Crowded positioning around LINK sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
Pros of BEAT
- Diversifying versus Chainlink with BEAT can change portfolio factor exposure.
- Narrative optionality around BEAT can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- If technical momentum aligns, BEAT may outperform on medium-term windows.
Cons of BEAT
- Trend failures on BEAT often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for BEAT.
- Higher volatility on BEAT cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave BEAT more exposed to liquidity droughts.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to Chainlink, while short-term performance leans toward Chainlink. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. Chainlink holds market-cap $6.30B and rank #19; BEAT shows $1.03B and #65. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch BEAT. Where durability matters, watch Chainlink. AI composite scores (47.70/56.80) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, Chainlink or BEAT?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Chainlink leads on market cap today, while Chainlink leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, LINK or BEAT?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Chainlink and BEAT.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. BEAT currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Chainlink, but longer windows can disagree.