Overview
Investors searching STX vs OP usually want a clear market-cap and momentum snapshot. STX prints $0.139700 (+1.75%) while Optimism is at $0.086200 (+1.53%), with volume edge currently on Optimism.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | STX | OP |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.139700 | $0.086200 |
| Market Cap | $258.66M | $216.56M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $374,076.46 | $1.69M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 134.00 | 162.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +6.00% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | STX | OP |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +1.75% | +1.53% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | STX | OP |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 31.27 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 0.01 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.21 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | — |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 0.10 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 65.00 | — |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Relative technical health favors reading both charts side by side. AI scores (57.80 vs 47.30) summarize PEPS modules, but supports and resistances still decide invalidation.
Fundamentals
| Metric | STX | OP |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | 0.00 |
| Github activity | — | 0.00 |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
STX
Optimism
Pros and cons
Pros of STX
- Composite PEPS readings for STX can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- STX often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- Higher ranking for STX can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
Cons of STX
- When dominance narratives fade, STX can lag hotter rotation names.
- Large-cap status for STX can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Crowded positioning around STX sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit STX harder simply because it is more visible.
Pros of Optimism
- Narrative optionality around Optimism can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- Optimism can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Active volume bursts on OP sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
Cons of Optimism
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave Optimism more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Higher volatility on OP cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Trend failures on Optimism often travel faster than on more established assets.
Which looks stronger right now?
If you weight capitalization and liquidity, STX looks sturdier; if you weight 24h tape, STX is ahead. A balanced view treats both as incomplete signals.
AI summary
PEPS synthesizes module output into a readable pair brief. Headline stats put STX at $0.139700 and Optimism at $0.086200. Relative performance over 24h (STX) is a short window. Pair it with 30d/1y rows before inferring regime change. Return to related comparisons and individual coin intelligence pages to validate whether the relative story still holds after fresh prints.
FAQ
Which is better, STX or Optimism?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. STX leads on market cap today, while STX leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, STX or OP?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both STX and Optimism.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Optimism currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is STX, but longer windows can disagree.