Overview
From a portfolio lens, BUIDL ($2.70B) and PENDLE ($239.24M) offer different beta to bitcoin cycles. The overview below keeps the facts first and the narrative second.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | BUIDL | PENDLE |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,887.28 | $1.40 |
| Market Cap | $2.70B | $239.24M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $0.000000 | $932,560.18 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 35.00 | 145.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | BUIDL | PENDLE |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.00% | +0.29% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | BUIDL | PENDLE |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Automated technical notes for this pair highlight bearish conditions on BUIDL and bearish on PENDLE. Volatility differences can amplify short-term gaps.
Fundamentals
| Metric | BUIDL | PENDLE |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
BUIDL
PENDLE
Pros and cons
Pros of BUIDL
- Market-cap scale on BUIDL may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- Composite PEPS readings for BUIDL can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- BUIDL typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
Cons of BUIDL
- Indicator stacks on BUIDL may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Crowded positioning around BUIDL sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- When dominance narratives fade, BUIDL can lag hotter rotation names.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
Pros of PENDLE
- If technical momentum aligns, PENDLE may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Active volume bursts on PENDLE sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
Cons of PENDLE
- Relative underperformance versus BUIDL can persist through entire market regimes.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Trend failures on PENDLE often travel faster than on more established assets.
Which looks stronger right now?
Across winners above, no single coin dominates every column. Prefer scenarios: trend continuation favors the side with aligned momentum; mean-reversion favors the side stretched on RSI.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: BUIDL (BUIDL) trades near $1,887.28 with a +0.00% day move, while PENDLE (PENDLE) is around $1.40 (+0.29%). Volume leadership currently sits with PENDLE, and market-cap leadership with BUIDL. Technical trend labels read bearish vs bearish, with RSI near 49.02/49.02. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, BUIDL or PENDLE?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. BUIDL leads on market cap today, while PENDLE leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, BUIDL or PENDLE?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both BUIDL and PENDLE.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. PENDLE currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is PENDLE, but longer windows can disagree.