Overview
Investors searching BEAT vs QNT usually want a clear market-cap and momentum snapshot. BEAT prints $1,853.59 (-15.30%) while QNT is at $60.74 (-1.75%), with volume edge currently on BEAT.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | BEAT | QNT |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,853.59 | $60.74 |
| Market Cap | $1.22B | $883.34M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $54.38M | $529,183.76 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 59.00 | 72.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | BEAT | QNT |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -15.30% | -1.75% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | BEAT | QNT |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 67.00 | 67.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, BEAT shows RSI 49.02 with trend bias bearish, while QNT sits at RSI 49.02 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | BEAT | QNT |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
BEAT
QNT
Pros and cons
Pros of BEAT
- BEAT has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- Composite PEPS readings for BEAT can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Market-cap scale on BEAT may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- Higher ranking for BEAT can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
Cons of BEAT
- Large-cap status for BEAT can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Crowded positioning around BEAT sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- When dominance narratives fade, BEAT can lag hotter rotation names.
Pros of QNT
- Diversifying versus BEAT with QNT can change portfolio factor exposure.
- Narrative optionality around QNT can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- PEPS tracking for QNT still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
Cons of QNT
- Trend failures on QNT often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave QNT more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Higher volatility on QNT cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to BEAT, while short-term performance leans toward QNT. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: BEAT (BEAT) trades near $1,853.59 with a -15.30% day move, while QNT (QNT) is around $60.74 (-1.75%). Volume leadership currently sits with BEAT, and market-cap leadership with BEAT. Technical trend labels read bearish vs bearish, with RSI near 49.02/49.02. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, BEAT or QNT?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. BEAT leads on market cap today, while QNT leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, BEAT or QNT?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both BEAT and QNT.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. BEAT currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is QNT, but longer windows can disagree.