Overview
Investors searching RAY vs ACRED usually want a clear market-cap and momentum snapshot. RAY prints $0.611100 (+1.09%) while ACRED is at $1,880.40 (-0.10%), with volume edge currently on RAY.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | RAY | ACRED |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.611100 | $1,880.40 |
| Market Cap | $164.68M | $115.09M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $203,861.39 | $0.000000 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 179.00 | 232.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | RAY | ACRED |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +1.09% | -0.10% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | RAY | ACRED |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Relative technical health favors reading both charts side by side. AI scores (56.80 vs 56.80) summarize PEPS modules, but supports and resistances still decide invalidation.
Fundamentals
| Metric | RAY | ACRED |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
RAY
ACRED
Pros and cons
Pros of RAY
- Market-cap scale on RAY may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- RAY typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Composite PEPS readings for RAY can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
Cons of RAY
- Crowded positioning around RAY sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit RAY harder simply because it is more visible.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
Pros of ACRED
- ACRED can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- If technical momentum aligns, ACRED may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Narrative optionality around ACRED can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
Cons of ACRED
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for ACRED.
Which looks stronger right now?
If you weight capitalization and liquidity, RAY looks sturdier; if you weight 24h tape, RAY is ahead. A balanced view treats both as incomplete signals.
AI summary
PEPS synthesizes module output into a readable pair brief. Headline stats put RAY at $0.611100 and ACRED at $1,880.40. Relative performance over 24h (RAY) is a short window. Pair it with 30d/1y rows before inferring regime change. Return to related comparisons and individual coin intelligence pages to validate whether the relative story still holds after fresh prints.
FAQ
Which is better, RAY or ACRED?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. RAY leads on market cap today, while RAY leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, RAY or ACRED?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both RAY and ACRED.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. RAY currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is RAY, but longer windows can disagree.