Overview
Investors searching FIL vs ACRED usually want a clear market-cap and momentum snapshot. Filecoin prints $0.715800 (+0.27%) while ACRED is at $1,856.18 (-0.10%), with volume edge currently on Filecoin.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | FIL | ACRED |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.715800 | $1,856.18 |
| Market Cap | $562.65M | $115.01M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $4.88M | $0.000000 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 90.00 | 232.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +5.38% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | FIL | ACRED |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.27% | -0.10% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | FIL | ACRED |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 46.58 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 0.04 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 25.54 | 20.44 |
| Support | 0.67 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 0.82 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | — | 64.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Relative technical health favors reading both charts side by side. AI scores (45.60 vs 57.70) summarize PEPS modules, but supports and resistances still decide invalidation.
Fundamentals
| Metric | FIL | ACRED |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | 0.00 | — |
| Github activity | 0.00 | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Filecoin
ACRED
Pros and cons
Pros of Filecoin
- Composite PEPS readings for Filecoin can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Higher ranking for Filecoin can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- Market-cap scale on Filecoin may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
Cons of Filecoin
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit Filecoin harder simply because it is more visible.
- Large-cap status for Filecoin can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Indicator stacks on Filecoin may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- When dominance narratives fade, Filecoin can lag hotter rotation names.
Pros of ACRED
- Active volume bursts on ACRED sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- Diversifying versus Filecoin with ACRED can change portfolio factor exposure.
- If technical momentum aligns, ACRED may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Narrative optionality around ACRED can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
Cons of ACRED
- Trend failures on ACRED often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for ACRED.
- Relative underperformance versus Filecoin can persist through entire market regimes.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave ACRED more exposed to liquidity droughts.
Which looks stronger right now?
If you weight capitalization and liquidity, Filecoin looks sturdier; if you weight 24h tape, Filecoin is ahead. A balanced view treats both as incomplete signals.
AI summary
For readers asking which is “better”, the honest answer is conditional. Filecoin and ACRED solve overlapping but not identical market jobs. On-chain and developer fields, when available, add slower-moving context beneath the tape. Missing fundamentals should be treated as unknown, not as zeros. If your thesis is long-term adoption, weight fundamentals and liquidity; if tactical, weight trend/momentum — and always define invalidation.
FAQ
Which is better, Filecoin or ACRED?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Filecoin leads on market cap today, while Filecoin leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, FIL or ACRED?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Filecoin and ACRED.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Filecoin currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Filecoin, but longer windows can disagree.