Overview
Whether you arrived from a “APE vs NEO” query or from PEPS coin pages, this hub aggregates ranks, performance and module-backed signals into one canonical URL.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | APE | NEO |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.130900 | $1.82 |
| Market Cap | $130.96M | $128.45M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $446,846.70 | $124,245.77 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 212.00 | 217.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | APE | NEO |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -0.83% | -0.66% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | APE | NEO |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 67.00 | 67.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for APE/NEO currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | APE | NEO |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
APE
NEO
Pros and cons
Pros of APE
- Higher ranking for APE can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- APE has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- APE often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
Cons of APE
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit APE harder simply because it is more visible.
- Indicator stacks on APE may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
Pros of NEO
- Diversifying versus APE with NEO can change portfolio factor exposure.
- Active volume bursts on NEO sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- If technical momentum aligns, NEO may outperform on medium-term windows.
Cons of NEO
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave NEO more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Higher volatility on NEO cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for APE on size and APE on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: APE (APE) trades near $0.130900 with a -0.83% day move, while NEO (NEO) is around $1.82 (-0.66%). Volume leadership currently sits with APE, and market-cap leadership with APE. Technical trend labels read bearish vs bearish, with RSI near 49.02/49.02. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, APE or NEO?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. APE leads on market cap today, while NEO leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, APE or NEO?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both APE and NEO.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. APE currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is NEO, but longer windows can disagree.