Overview
Investors searching SHFL vs 1INCH usually want a clear market-cap and momentum snapshot. SHFL prints $1,861.70 (-0.80%) while 1INCH is at $0.081400 (+0.87%), with volume edge currently on SHFL.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | SHFL | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,861.70 | $0.081400 |
| Market Cap | $126.77M | $114.26M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $512,972.00 | $323,022.75 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 217.00 | 236.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | SHFL | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -0.80% | +0.87% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | SHFL | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 65.00 | 65.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Automated technical notes for this pair highlight bearish conditions on SHFL and bearish on 1INCH. Volatility differences can amplify short-term gaps.
Fundamentals
| Metric | SHFL | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
SHFL
1INCH
Pros and cons
Pros of SHFL
- Higher ranking for SHFL can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- Market-cap scale on SHFL may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
Cons of SHFL
- When dominance narratives fade, SHFL can lag hotter rotation names.
- Large-cap status for SHFL can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
Pros of 1INCH
- Diversifying versus SHFL with 1INCH can change portfolio factor exposure.
- If technical momentum aligns, 1INCH may outperform on medium-term windows.
Cons of 1INCH
- Trend failures on 1INCH often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for 1INCH.
Which looks stronger right now?
Across winners above, no single coin dominates every column. Prefer scenarios: trend continuation favors the side with aligned momentum; mean-reversion favors the side stretched on RSI.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. SHFL holds market-cap $126.77M and rank #217; 1INCH shows $114.26M and #236. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch SHFL. Where durability matters, watch SHFL. AI composite scores (57.80/57.80) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, SHFL or 1INCH?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. SHFL leads on market cap today, while 1INCH leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, SHFL or 1INCH?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both SHFL and 1INCH.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. SHFL currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is 1INCH, but longer windows can disagree.