Overview
Whether you arrived from a “PUMP vs 1INCH” query or from PEPS coin pages, this hub aggregates ranks, performance and module-backed signals into one canonical URL.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | PUMP | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.002150 | $0.081800 |
| Market Cap | $845.20M | $114.84M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $9.86M | $300,661.76 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 76.00 | 235.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | PUMP | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +3.17% | +2.00% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | PUMP | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 63.00 | 63.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for PUMP/1INCH currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | PUMP | 1INCH |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
PUMP
1INCH
Pros and cons
Pros of PUMP
- Market-cap scale on PUMP may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- Higher ranking for PUMP can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- PUMP typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
Cons of PUMP
- Crowded positioning around PUMP sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit PUMP harder simply because it is more visible.
Pros of 1INCH
- 1INCH can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- If technical momentum aligns, 1INCH may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Diversifying versus PUMP with 1INCH can change portfolio factor exposure.
Cons of 1INCH
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Relative underperformance versus PUMP can persist through entire market regimes.
- Trend failures on 1INCH often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Higher volatility on 1INCH cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for PUMP on size and PUMP on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
Comparing PUMP and 1INCH begins with structure: capitalization, volume and rank. Present prints are $0.002150 versus $0.081800. Momentum and trend can disagree with market-cap hierarchy. That is normal in crypto rotations and should be stress-tested against supports and news flow. Canonical URLs prevent duplicate 1INCH-vs-PUMP pages, keeping SEO equity on one comparison. Keep monitoring winners as data updates.
FAQ
Which is better, PUMP or 1INCH?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. PUMP leads on market cap today, while PUMP leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, PUMP or 1INCH?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both PUMP and 1INCH.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. PUMP currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is PUMP, but longer windows can disagree.