Overview
Whether you arrived from a “APE vs ZK” query or from PEPS coin pages, this hub aggregates ranks, performance and module-backed signals into one canonical URL.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | APE | ZK |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.132300 | $0.007820 |
| Market Cap | $132.11M | $78.73M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $424,672.97 | $625,743.99 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 212.00 | 294.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | APE | ZK |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +1.15% | -0.13% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | APE | ZK |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 63.00 | 63.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
When RSI and trend disagree across APE and ZK, expect choppy relative performance until one side reclaims a clear structure.
Fundamentals
| Metric | APE | ZK |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
APE
ZK
Pros and cons
Pros of APE
- Higher ranking for APE can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- Composite PEPS readings for APE can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- APE typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
Cons of APE
- When dominance narratives fade, APE can lag hotter rotation names.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
Pros of ZK
- Diversifying versus APE with ZK can change portfolio factor exposure.
- Narrative optionality around ZK can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- If technical momentum aligns, ZK may outperform on medium-term windows.
Cons of ZK
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave ZK more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for ZK.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Trend failures on ZK often travel faster than on more established assets.
Which looks stronger right now?
The “stronger” label here is descriptive, not predictive. APE and ZK can alternate leadership as macro liquidity and narrative rotate.
AI summary
Comparing APE and ZK begins with structure: capitalization, volume and rank. Present prints are $0.132300 versus $0.007820. Momentum and trend can disagree with market-cap hierarchy. That is normal in crypto rotations and should be stress-tested against supports and news flow. Canonical URLs prevent duplicate ZK-vs-APE pages, keeping SEO equity on one comparison. Keep monitoring winners as data updates.
FAQ
Which is better, APE or ZK?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. APE leads on market cap today, while APE leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, APE or ZK?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both APE and ZK.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. ZK currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is APE, but longer windows can disagree.