Overview
From a portfolio lens, USDY ($2.15B) and WLD ($1.13B) offer different beta to bitcoin cycles. The overview below keeps the facts first and the narrative second.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | USDY | WLD |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,880.40 | $0.315700 |
| Market Cap | $2.15B | $1.13B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $2.16M | $9.97M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 40.00 | 61.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | USDY | WLD |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.20% | +4.85% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | USDY | WLD |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, USDY shows RSI 54.31 with trend bias bearish, while WLD sits at RSI 54.31 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | USDY | WLD |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
USDY
WLD
Pros and cons
Pros of USDY
- Higher ranking for USDY can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- USDY has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- USDY often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- Composite PEPS readings for USDY can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
Cons of USDY
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit USDY harder simply because it is more visible.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- Large-cap status for USDY can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
Pros of WLD
- Active volume bursts on WLD sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- Narrative optionality around WLD can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- If technical momentum aligns, WLD may outperform on medium-term windows.
Cons of WLD
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for WLD.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave WLD more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Relative underperformance versus USDY can persist through entire market regimes.
- Trend failures on WLD often travel faster than on more established assets.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to USDY, while short-term performance leans toward WLD. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
Comparing USDY and WLD begins with structure: capitalization, volume and rank. Present prints are $1,880.40 versus $0.315700. Momentum and trend can disagree with market-cap hierarchy. That is normal in crypto rotations and should be stress-tested against supports and news flow. Canonical URLs prevent duplicate WLD-vs-USDY pages, keeping SEO equity on one comparison. Keep monitoring winners as data updates.
FAQ
Which is better, USDY or WLD?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. USDY leads on market cap today, while WLD leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, USDY or WLD?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both USDY and WLD.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. WLD currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is WLD, but longer windows can disagree.