Overview
From a portfolio lens, USD1 ($3.99B) and BUIDL ($2.70B) offer different beta to bitcoin cycles. The overview below keeps the facts first and the narrative second.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | USD1 | BUIDL |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.00 | $1,880.40 |
| Market Cap | $3.99B | $2.70B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $61.07M | $0.000000 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 24.00 | 35.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | USD1 | BUIDL |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.01% | +0.00% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | USD1 | BUIDL |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, USD1 shows RSI 54.31 with trend bias bearish, while BUIDL sits at RSI 54.31 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | USD1 | BUIDL |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
USD1
BUIDL
Pros and cons
Pros of USD1
- USD1 has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- Market-cap scale on USD1 may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- Higher ranking for USD1 can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
Cons of USD1
- Large-cap status for USD1 can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit USD1 harder simply because it is more visible.
- Crowded positioning around USD1 sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
Pros of BUIDL
- Narrative optionality around BUIDL can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- PEPS tracking for BUIDL still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- Active volume bursts on BUIDL sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
Cons of BUIDL
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave BUIDL more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Relative underperformance versus USD1 can persist through entire market regimes.
- Trend failures on BUIDL often travel faster than on more established assets.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to USD1, while short-term performance leans toward USD1. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
Comparing USD1 and BUIDL begins with structure: capitalization, volume and rank. Present prints are $1.00 versus $1,880.40. Momentum and trend can disagree with market-cap hierarchy. That is normal in crypto rotations and should be stress-tested against supports and news flow. Canonical URLs prevent duplicate BUIDL-vs-USD1 pages, keeping SEO equity on one comparison. Keep monitoring winners as data updates.
FAQ
Which is better, USD1 or BUIDL?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. USD1 leads on market cap today, while USD1 leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, USD1 or BUIDL?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both USD1 and BUIDL.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. USD1 currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is USD1, but longer windows can disagree.