Overview
PEPS ranks this pair inside the Top 300 market-cap universe. That means Uniswap and Filecoin are liquid enough for an indexable comparison, with metrics refreshed on the hourly coin pipeline.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | UNI | FIL |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $4.19 | $0.717000 |
| Market Cap | $2.43B | $562.65M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $13.05M | $4.36M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 36.00 | 90.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +6.05% | +5.38% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | UNI | FIL |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +2.74% | +2.24% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | UNI | FIL |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 64.00 | 46.58 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 0.26 | 0.04 |
| ADX | 41.22 | 25.54 |
| Support | 3.53 | 0.67 |
| Resistance | 5.75 | 0.82 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | — | — |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
When RSI and trend disagree across Uniswap and Filecoin, expect choppy relative performance until one side reclaims a clear structure.
Fundamentals
| Metric | UNI | FIL |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Github activity | 5,019.00 | 0.00 |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Uniswap
Filecoin
Pros and cons
Pros of Uniswap
- UNI often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- Market-cap scale on Uniswap may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- Uniswap has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- Uniswap typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
Cons of Uniswap
- Crowded positioning around UNI sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Large-cap status for Uniswap can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Indicator stacks on Uniswap may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
Pros of Filecoin
- Filecoin can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- PEPS tracking for Filecoin still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- Active volume bursts on FIL sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- If technical momentum aligns, Filecoin may outperform on medium-term windows.
Cons of Filecoin
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Relative underperformance versus Uniswap can persist through entire market regimes.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave Filecoin more exposed to liquidity droughts.
Which looks stronger right now?
The “stronger” label here is descriptive, not predictive. Uniswap and Filecoin can alternate leadership as macro liquidity and narrative rotate.
AI summary
For readers asking which is “better”, the honest answer is conditional. Uniswap and Filecoin solve overlapping but not identical market jobs. On-chain and developer fields, when available, add slower-moving context beneath the tape. Missing fundamentals should be treated as unknown, not as zeros. If your thesis is long-term adoption, weight fundamentals and liquidity; if tactical, weight trend/momentum — and always define invalidation.
FAQ
Which is better, Uniswap or Filecoin?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Uniswap leads on market cap today, while Uniswap leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, UNI or FIL?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Uniswap and Filecoin.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Uniswap currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Uniswap, but longer windows can disagree.