Overview
This page compares ULTIMA and FARTCOIN with live PEPS metrics. Rankings (#156 vs #214) and liquidity profiles differ, so traders often use them for distinct roles rather than as perfect substitutes.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | ULTIMA | FARTCOIN |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,880.40 | $1,880.40 |
| Market Cap | $208.38M | $129.45M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $3.02M | $10.12M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 156.00 | 214.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | ULTIMA | FARTCOIN |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +3.30% | +2.10% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | ULTIMA | FARTCOIN |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for ULTIMA/FARTCOIN currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | ULTIMA | FARTCOIN |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
ULTIMA
FARTCOIN
Pros and cons
Pros of ULTIMA
- Market-cap scale on ULTIMA may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- ULTIMA typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Higher ranking for ULTIMA can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
Cons of ULTIMA
- Indicator stacks on ULTIMA may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- When dominance narratives fade, ULTIMA can lag hotter rotation names.
Pros of FARTCOIN
- FARTCOIN can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- If technical momentum aligns, FARTCOIN may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Diversifying versus ULTIMA with FARTCOIN can change portfolio factor exposure.
Cons of FARTCOIN
- Relative underperformance versus ULTIMA can persist through entire market regimes.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave FARTCOIN more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for ULTIMA on size and FARTCOIN on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
PEPS synthesizes module output into a readable pair brief. Headline stats put ULTIMA at $1,880.40 and FARTCOIN at $1,880.40. Relative performance over 24h (ULTIMA) is a short window. Pair it with 30d/1y rows before inferring regime change. Return to related comparisons and individual coin intelligence pages to validate whether the relative story still holds after fresh prints.
FAQ
Which is better, ULTIMA or FARTCOIN?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. ULTIMA leads on market cap today, while ULTIMA leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, ULTIMA or FARTCOIN?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both ULTIMA and FARTCOIN.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. FARTCOIN currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is ULTIMA, but longer windows can disagree.