Overview
From a portfolio lens, BUIDL ($2.70B) and ULTIMA ($208.90M) offer different beta to bitcoin cycles. The overview below keeps the facts first and the narrative second.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | BUIDL | ULTIMA |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,841.41 | $1,841.41 |
| Market Cap | $2.70B | $208.90M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $0.000000 | $3.57M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 34 | 155 |
| Dominance | 0.12% | 0.01% |
| Liquidity | 69.5/100 | 69.5/100 |
| Volatility | 3.50% | 3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | BUIDL | ULTIMA |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.00% | +2.50% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | BUIDL | ULTIMA |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | 1,850.66 | 1,850.66 |
| EMA50 | 2,164.66 | 2,164.66 |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,853.40 | 1,853.40 |
| Trend | SHORT | SHORT |
| Momentum | 63.00 | 63.00 |
| Signal | BUY | BUY |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, BUIDL shows RSI 54.31 with trend bias SHORT, while ULTIMA sits at RSI 54.31 (SHORT). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | BUIDL | ULTIMA |
|---|---|---|
| Whale activity | $0.000000 | $0.000000 |
Ecosystem
BUIDL
ULTIMA
Pros and cons
Pros of BUIDL
- Composite PEPS readings for BUIDL can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- BUIDL typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Higher ranking for BUIDL can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
Cons of BUIDL
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit BUIDL harder simply because it is more visible.
- When dominance narratives fade, BUIDL can lag hotter rotation names.
- Indicator stacks on BUIDL may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
Pros of ULTIMA
- Narrative optionality around ULTIMA can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- If technical momentum aligns, ULTIMA may outperform on medium-term windows.
Cons of ULTIMA
- Trend failures on ULTIMA often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Higher volatility on ULTIMA cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to BUIDL, while short-term performance leans toward ULTIMA. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
PEPS synthesizes module output into a readable pair brief. Headline stats put BUIDL at $1,841.41 and ULTIMA at $1,841.41. Relative performance over 24h (ULTIMA) is a short window. Pair it with 30d/1y rows before inferring regime change. Return to related comparisons and individual coin intelligence pages to validate whether the relative story still holds after fresh prints.
FAQ
Which is better, BUIDL or ULTIMA?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. BUIDL leads on market cap today, while ULTIMA leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, BUIDL or ULTIMA?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both BUIDL and ULTIMA.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. ULTIMA currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is ULTIMA, but longer windows can disagree.