Overview
Whether you arrived from a “RAY vs RUNE” query or from PEPS coin pages, this hub aggregates ranks, performance and module-backed signals into one canonical URL.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | RAY | RUNE |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.606500 | $0.442000 |
| Market Cap | $163.42M | $149.28M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $226,513.82 | $678,823.86 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 179.00 | 198.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | RAY | RUNE |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.13% | +0.46% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | RAY | RUNE |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 67.00 | 67.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
When RSI and trend disagree across RAY and RUNE, expect choppy relative performance until one side reclaims a clear structure.
Fundamentals
| Metric | RAY | RUNE |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
RAY
RUNE
Pros and cons
Pros of RAY
- Composite PEPS readings for RAY can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- RAY has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- RAY often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
Cons of RAY
- When dominance narratives fade, RAY can lag hotter rotation names.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- Large-cap status for RAY can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
Pros of RUNE
- Active volume bursts on RUNE sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- Diversifying versus RAY with RUNE can change portfolio factor exposure.
- PEPS tracking for RUNE still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
Cons of RUNE
- Trend failures on RUNE often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Higher volatility on RUNE cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave RUNE more exposed to liquidity droughts.
Which looks stronger right now?
The “stronger” label here is descriptive, not predictive. RAY and RUNE can alternate leadership as macro liquidity and narrative rotate.
AI summary
Comparing RAY and RUNE begins with structure: capitalization, volume and rank. Present prints are $0.606500 versus $0.442000. Momentum and trend can disagree with market-cap hierarchy. That is normal in crypto rotations and should be stress-tested against supports and news flow. Canonical URLs prevent duplicate RUNE-vs-RAY pages, keeping SEO equity on one comparison. Keep monitoring winners as data updates.
FAQ
Which is better, RAY or RUNE?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. RAY leads on market cap today, while RUNE leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, RAY or RUNE?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both RAY and RUNE.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. RUNE currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is RUNE, but longer windows can disagree.