Overview
PEPS ranks this pair inside the Top 300 market-cap universe. That means Curve DAO and The Graph are liquid enough for an indexable comparison, with metrics refreshed on the hourly coin pipeline.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | CRV | GRT |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.200747 | $0.014572 |
| Market Cap | $309.86M | $157.32M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $18.84M | $10.28M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 121.00 | 189.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | CRV | GRT |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.30% | +2.70% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | CRV | GRT |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for CRV/GRT currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | CRV | GRT |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Curve DAO
The Graph
Pros and cons
Pros of Curve DAO
- Curve DAO typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Higher ranking for Curve DAO can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
Cons of Curve DAO
- Crowded positioning around CRV sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Indicator stacks on Curve DAO may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit Curve DAO harder simply because it is more visible.
Pros of The Graph
- The Graph can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Diversifying versus Curve DAO with The Graph can change portfolio factor exposure.
- PEPS tracking for The Graph still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
Cons of The Graph
- Higher volatility on GRT cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Trend failures on The Graph often travel faster than on more established assets.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for Curve DAO on size and Curve DAO on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: Curve DAO (CRV) trades near $0.200747 with a +0.30% day move, while The Graph (GRT) is around $0.014572 (+2.70%). Volume leadership currently sits with Curve DAO, and market-cap leadership with Curve DAO. Technical trend labels read bearish vs bearish, with RSI near 54.31/54.31. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, Curve DAO or The Graph?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Curve DAO leads on market cap today, while The Graph leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, CRV or GRT?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Curve DAO and The Graph.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Curve DAO currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is The Graph, but longer windows can disagree.