Overview
From a portfolio lens, Sui ($2.91B) and POL (ex-MATIC) ($826.65M) offer different beta to bitcoin cycles. The overview below keeps the facts first and the narrative second.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | SUI | POL |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.691600 | $0.073110 |
| Market Cap | $2.91B | $826.65M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $11.99M | $1.24M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 33.00 | 77.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +4.43% | +3.66% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | SUI | POL |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +1.02% | +0.21% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | SUI | POL |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 37.71 | 35.61 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 0.03 | 0.00 |
| ADX | 18.50 | 24.06 |
| Support | 0.66 | 0.07 |
| Resistance | 0.78 | 0.08 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | — | — |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, Sui shows RSI 37.71 with trend bias bearish, while POL (ex-MATIC) sits at RSI 35.61 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | SUI | POL |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | 219.00 | 0.00 |
| Github activity | 5,403.00 | 0.00 |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Sui
POL (ex-MATIC)
Pros and cons
Pros of Sui
- Composite PEPS readings for Sui can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Higher ranking for Sui can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- Sui typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Sui has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
Cons of Sui
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit Sui harder simply because it is more visible.
- Large-cap status for Sui can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
Pros of POL (ex-MATIC)
- Narrative optionality around POL (ex-MATIC) can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- PEPS tracking for POL (ex-MATIC) still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
Cons of POL (ex-MATIC)
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for POL (ex-MATIC).
- Trend failures on POL (ex-MATIC) often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Relative underperformance versus Sui can persist through entire market regimes.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to Sui, while short-term performance leans toward Sui. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: Sui (SUI) trades near $0.691600 with a +1.02% day move, while POL (ex-MATIC) (POL) is around $0.073110 (+0.21%). Volume leadership currently sits with Sui, and market-cap leadership with Sui. Technical trend labels read bearish vs bearish, with RSI near 37.71/35.61. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, Sui or POL (ex-MATIC)?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Sui leads on market cap today, while Sui leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, SUI or POL?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Sui and POL (ex-MATIC).
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Sui currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Sui, but longer windows can disagree.