Overview
Investors searching SUI vs ACRED usually want a clear market-cap and momentum snapshot. Sui prints $0.694900 (+2.39%) while ACRED is at $1,887.28 (-0.20%), with volume edge currently on Sui.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | SUI | ACRED |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.694900 | $1,887.28 |
| Market Cap | $2.91B | $115.03M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $9.23M | $0.000000 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 33.00 | 233.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +4.43% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | SUI | ACRED |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +2.39% | -0.20% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | SUI | ACRED |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 37.71 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 0.03 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 18.50 | 21.33 |
| Support | 0.66 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 0.78 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | — | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, Sui shows RSI 37.71 with trend bias bearish, while ACRED sits at RSI 49.02 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | SUI | ACRED |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | 219.00 | — |
| Github activity | 5,403.00 | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Sui
ACRED
Pros and cons
Pros of Sui
- Market-cap scale on Sui may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- Composite PEPS readings for Sui can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
Cons of Sui
- Indicator stacks on Sui may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Crowded positioning around SUI sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Large-cap status for Sui can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
Pros of ACRED
- If technical momentum aligns, ACRED may outperform on medium-term windows.
- ACRED can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Diversifying versus Sui with ACRED can change portfolio factor exposure.
- PEPS tracking for ACRED still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
Cons of ACRED
- Higher volatility on ACRED cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave ACRED more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Relative underperformance versus Sui can persist through entire market regimes.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to Sui, while short-term performance leans toward Sui. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
Comparing SUI and ACRED begins with structure: capitalization, volume and rank. Present prints are $0.694900 versus $1,887.28. Momentum and trend can disagree with market-cap hierarchy. That is normal in crypto rotations and should be stress-tested against supports and news flow. Canonical URLs prevent duplicate ACRED-vs-SUI pages, keeping SEO equity on one comparison. Keep monitoring winners as data updates.
FAQ
Which is better, Sui or ACRED?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Sui leads on market cap today, while Sui leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, SUI or ACRED?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Sui and ACRED.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Sui currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Sui, but longer windows can disagree.