Overview
This page compares USDY and SHFL with live PEPS metrics. Rankings (#40 vs #236) and liquidity profiles differ, so traders often use them for distinct roles rather than as perfect substitutes.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | USDY | SHFL |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,865.83 | $1,865.83 |
| Market Cap | $2.15B | $113.66M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $2.95M | $1.46M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 40.00 | 236.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | USDY | SHFL |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.00% | -10.50% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | USDY | SHFL |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 60.00 | 60.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Use the indicator table as a checklist: if momentum and trend align on one asset while the other diverges, relative-value setups become more interesting — still without certainty.
Fundamentals
| Metric | USDY | SHFL |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
USDY
SHFL
Pros and cons
Pros of USDY
- USDY typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- USDY has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- USDY often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
Cons of USDY
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- Large-cap status for USDY can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Indicator stacks on USDY may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
Pros of SHFL
- PEPS tracking for SHFL still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- If technical momentum aligns, SHFL may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Diversifying versus USDY with SHFL can change portfolio factor exposure.
Cons of SHFL
- Relative underperformance versus USDY can persist through entire market regimes.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave SHFL more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
Which looks stronger right now?
Statistically, higher market cap (USDY) often correlates with deeper books, while hotter 24h prints (USDY) can fade. Position sizing should reflect that uncertainty.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. USDY holds market-cap $2.15B and rank #40; SHFL shows $113.66M and #236. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch USDY. Where durability matters, watch USDY. AI composite scores (58.20/58.20) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, USDY or SHFL?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. USDY leads on market cap today, while USDY leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, USDY or SHFL?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both USDY and SHFL.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. USDY currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is USDY, but longer windows can disagree.