Overview
PEPS ranks this pair inside the Top 300 market-cap universe. That means dogwifhat and Shuffle are liquid enough for an indexable comparison, with metrics refreshed on the hourly coin pipeline.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | WIF | SHFL |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.138701 | $0.269618 |
| Market Cap | $138.51M | $114.60M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $21.84M | $1.45M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 205.00 | 237.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | WIF | SHFL |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +2.00% | -10.10% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | WIF | SHFL |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for WIF/SHFL currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | WIF | SHFL |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
dogwifhat
Shuffle
Pros and cons
Pros of dogwifhat
- Higher ranking for dogwifhat can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- Composite PEPS readings for dogwifhat can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Market-cap scale on dogwifhat may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
Cons of dogwifhat
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit dogwifhat harder simply because it is more visible.
- Indicator stacks on dogwifhat may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- When dominance narratives fade, dogwifhat can lag hotter rotation names.
Pros of Shuffle
- Diversifying versus dogwifhat with Shuffle can change portfolio factor exposure.
- Active volume bursts on SHFL sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- PEPS tracking for Shuffle still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- Narrative optionality around Shuffle can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
Cons of Shuffle
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for Shuffle.
- Trend failures on Shuffle often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Higher volatility on SHFL cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for dogwifhat on size and dogwifhat on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: dogwifhat (WIF) trades near $0.138701 with a +2.00% day move, while Shuffle (SHFL) is around $0.269618 (-10.10%). Volume leadership currently sits with dogwifhat, and market-cap leadership with dogwifhat. Technical trend labels read bearish vs bearish, with RSI near 54.31/54.31. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, dogwifhat or Shuffle?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. dogwifhat leads on market cap today, while dogwifhat leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, WIF or SHFL?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both dogwifhat and Shuffle.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. dogwifhat currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is dogwifhat, but longer windows can disagree.