Overview
PEPS ranks this pair inside the Top 300 market-cap universe. That means Cosmos Hub and Shuffle are liquid enough for an indexable comparison, with metrics refreshed on the hourly coin pipeline.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | ATOM | SHFL |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.26 | $0.298731 |
| Market Cap | $660.47M | $127.00M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $23.19M | $509,158.00 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 85.00 | 216.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +4.22% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | ATOM | SHFL |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +2.70% | -0.50% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | ATOM | SHFL |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 18.97 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 0.05 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 51.19 | 21.33 |
| Support | — | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1.61 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | — | 65.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
When RSI and trend disagree across Cosmos Hub and Shuffle, expect choppy relative performance until one side reclaims a clear structure.
Fundamentals
| Metric | ATOM | SHFL |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | 0.00 | — |
| Github activity | 1,299.00 | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Cosmos Hub
Shuffle
Pros and cons
Pros of Cosmos Hub
- Composite PEPS readings for Cosmos Hub can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Higher ranking for Cosmos Hub can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- ATOM often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- Cosmos Hub has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
Cons of Cosmos Hub
- When dominance narratives fade, Cosmos Hub can lag hotter rotation names.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit Cosmos Hub harder simply because it is more visible.
- Indicator stacks on Cosmos Hub may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Large-cap status for Cosmos Hub can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
Pros of Shuffle
- Narrative optionality around Shuffle can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- Diversifying versus Cosmos Hub with Shuffle can change portfolio factor exposure.
- If technical momentum aligns, Shuffle may outperform on medium-term windows.
Cons of Shuffle
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for Shuffle.
- Trend failures on Shuffle often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Higher volatility on SHFL cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
Which looks stronger right now?
The “stronger” label here is descriptive, not predictive. Cosmos Hub and Shuffle can alternate leadership as macro liquidity and narrative rotate.
AI summary
PEPS synthesizes module output into a readable pair brief. Headline stats put Cosmos Hub at $1.26 and Shuffle at $0.298731. Relative performance over 24h (Cosmos Hub) is a short window. Pair it with 30d/1y rows before inferring regime change. Return to related comparisons and individual coin intelligence pages to validate whether the relative story still holds after fresh prints.
FAQ
Which is better, Cosmos Hub or Shuffle?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Cosmos Hub leads on market cap today, while Cosmos Hub leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, ATOM or SHFL?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Cosmos Hub and Shuffle.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Cosmos Hub currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Cosmos Hub, but longer windows can disagree.