Overview
Investors searching SEI vs APE usually want a clear market-cap and momentum snapshot. Sei prints $0.041570 (+1.29%) while APE is at $0.132100 (+1.07%), with volume edge currently on Sei.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | SEI | APE |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.041570 | $0.132100 |
| Market Cap | $301.91M | $131.96M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $819,276.78 | $412,654.57 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 129.00 | 212.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | SEI | APE |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +1.29% | +1.07% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | SEI | APE |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, Sei shows RSI 49.02 with trend bias bearish, while APE sits at RSI 49.02 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | SEI | APE |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | 0.00 | — |
| Github activity | 0.00 | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Sei
APE
Pros and cons
Pros of Sei
- Sei has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- Higher ranking for Sei can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- Sei typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
Cons of Sei
- When dominance narratives fade, Sei can lag hotter rotation names.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit Sei harder simply because it is more visible.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
Pros of APE
- Diversifying versus Sei with APE can change portfolio factor exposure.
- Active volume bursts on APE sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- PEPS tracking for APE still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
Cons of APE
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for APE.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave APE more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to Sei, while short-term performance leans toward Sei. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
Comparing SEI and APE begins with structure: capitalization, volume and rank. Present prints are $0.041570 versus $0.132100. Momentum and trend can disagree with market-cap hierarchy. That is normal in crypto rotations and should be stress-tested against supports and news flow. Canonical URLs prevent duplicate APE-vs-SEI pages, keeping SEO equity on one comparison. Keep monitoring winners as data updates.
FAQ
Which is better, Sei or APE?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Sei leads on market cap today, while Sei leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, SEI or APE?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Sei and APE.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Sei currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Sei, but longer windows can disagree.