Overview
USDY and RAY rarely move in perfect sync. Today’s print ($1,880.40/$0.611322) and 24h leaders (Raydium) help frame which side currently carries relative strength.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | USDY | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,880.40 | $0.611322 |
| Market Cap | $2.15B | $164.68M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $2.16M | $7.48M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 40.00 | 179.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | USDY | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.20% | +1.70% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | USDY | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, USDY shows RSI 54.31 with trend bias bearish, while Raydium sits at RSI 49.02 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | USDY | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
USDY
Raydium
Pros and cons
Pros of USDY
- Market-cap scale on USDY may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- USDY typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Composite PEPS readings for USDY can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
Cons of USDY
- Crowded positioning around USDY sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Indicator stacks on USDY may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Large-cap status for USDY can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
Pros of Raydium
- Raydium can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Diversifying versus USDY with Raydium can change portfolio factor exposure.
- If technical momentum aligns, Raydium may outperform on medium-term windows.
Cons of Raydium
- Higher volatility on RAY cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Trend failures on Raydium often travel faster than on more established assets.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to USDY, while short-term performance leans toward Raydium. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. USDY holds market-cap $2.15B and rank #40; Raydium shows $164.68M and #179. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch Raydium. Where durability matters, watch USDY. AI composite scores (56.80/56.80) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, USDY or Raydium?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. USDY leads on market cap today, while Raydium leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, USDY or RAY?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both USDY and Raydium.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Raydium currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Raydium, but longer windows can disagree.