Overview
JUP and RAY rarely move in perfect sync. Today’s print ($0.193599/$0.606267) and 24h leaders (Raydium) help frame which side currently carries relative strength.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | JUP | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.193599 | $0.606267 |
| Market Cap | $642.77M | $163.26M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $18.12M | $7.19M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 88.00 | 179.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | JUP | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -0.50% | -0.10% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | JUP | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 60.00 | 60.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Relative technical health favors reading both charts side by side. AI scores (58.20 vs 58.20) summarize PEPS modules, but supports and resistances still decide invalidation.
Fundamentals
| Metric | JUP | RAY |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Jupiter
Raydium
Pros and cons
Pros of Jupiter
- JUP often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- Market-cap scale on Jupiter may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- Higher ranking for Jupiter can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
Cons of Jupiter
- Indicator stacks on Jupiter may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit Jupiter harder simply because it is more visible.
- Crowded positioning around JUP sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
Pros of Raydium
- PEPS tracking for Raydium still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- Raydium can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Diversifying versus Jupiter with Raydium can change portfolio factor exposure.
- If technical momentum aligns, Raydium may outperform on medium-term windows.
Cons of Raydium
- Higher volatility on RAY cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for Raydium.
Which looks stronger right now?
If you weight capitalization and liquidity, Jupiter looks sturdier; if you weight 24h tape, Raydium is ahead. A balanced view treats both as incomplete signals.
AI summary
Comparing JUP and RAY begins with structure: capitalization, volume and rank. Present prints are $0.193599 versus $0.606267. Momentum and trend can disagree with market-cap hierarchy. That is normal in crypto rotations and should be stress-tested against supports and news flow. Canonical URLs prevent duplicate RAY-vs-JUP pages, keeping SEO equity on one comparison. Keep monitoring winners as data updates.
FAQ
Which is better, Jupiter or Raydium?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Jupiter leads on market cap today, while Raydium leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, JUP or RAY?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Jupiter and Raydium.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Jupiter currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Raydium, but longer windows can disagree.