Overview
Investors searching RAY vs CHEEMS usually want a clear market-cap and momentum snapshot. RAY prints $0.610700 (+1.99%) while CHEEMS is at $1,874.22 (+3.30%), with volume edge currently on CHEEMS.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | RAY | CHEEMS |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.610700 | $1,874.22 |
| Market Cap | $164.40M | $100.29M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $188,674.63 | $272,098.00 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 179.00 | 254.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | RAY | CHEEMS |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +1.99% | +3.30% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | RAY | CHEEMS |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 63.00 | 63.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Relative technical health favors reading both charts side by side. AI scores (58.40 vs 58.40) summarize PEPS modules, but supports and resistances still decide invalidation.
Fundamentals
| Metric | RAY | CHEEMS |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
RAY
CHEEMS
Pros and cons
Pros of RAY
- Higher ranking for RAY can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- Market-cap scale on RAY may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
Cons of RAY
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit RAY harder simply because it is more visible.
- Large-cap status for RAY can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- When dominance narratives fade, RAY can lag hotter rotation names.
Pros of CHEEMS
- Narrative optionality around CHEEMS can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- CHEEMS can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Active volume bursts on CHEEMS sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
Cons of CHEEMS
- Trend failures on CHEEMS often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for CHEEMS.
- Higher volatility on CHEEMS cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
Which looks stronger right now?
If you weight capitalization and liquidity, RAY looks sturdier; if you weight 24h tape, CHEEMS is ahead. A balanced view treats both as incomplete signals.
AI summary
Comparing RAY and CHEEMS begins with structure: capitalization, volume and rank. Present prints are $0.610700 versus $1,874.22. Momentum and trend can disagree with market-cap hierarchy. That is normal in crypto rotations and should be stress-tested against supports and news flow. Canonical URLs prevent duplicate CHEEMS-vs-RAY pages, keeping SEO equity on one comparison. Keep monitoring winners as data updates.
FAQ
Which is better, RAY or CHEEMS?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. RAY leads on market cap today, while CHEEMS leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, RAY or CHEEMS?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both RAY and CHEEMS.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. CHEEMS currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is CHEEMS, but longer windows can disagree.