Overview
From a portfolio lens, RAY ($163.75M) and BAT ($100.11M) offer different beta to bitcoin cycles. The overview below keeps the facts first and the narrative second.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | RAY | BAT |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.608900 | $0.066700 |
| Market Cap | $163.75M | $100.11M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $216,931.51 | $143,654.27 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 180.00 | 257.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | RAY | BAT |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.78% | +1.06% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | RAY | BAT |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 65.00 | 65.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Relative technical health favors reading both charts side by side. AI scores (57.80 vs 57.80) summarize PEPS modules, but supports and resistances still decide invalidation.
Fundamentals
| Metric | RAY | BAT |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
RAY
BAT
Pros and cons
Pros of RAY
- Higher ranking for RAY can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- RAY often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- RAY has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
Cons of RAY
- Large-cap status for RAY can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Indicator stacks on RAY may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit RAY harder simply because it is more visible.
Pros of BAT
- Diversifying versus RAY with BAT can change portfolio factor exposure.
- Active volume bursts on BAT sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- PEPS tracking for BAT still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
Cons of BAT
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave BAT more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Relative underperformance versus RAY can persist through entire market regimes.
Which looks stronger right now?
If you weight capitalization and liquidity, RAY looks sturdier; if you weight 24h tape, BAT is ahead. A balanced view treats both as incomplete signals.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: RAY (RAY) trades near $0.608900 with a +0.78% day move, while BAT (BAT) is around $0.066700 (+1.06%). Volume leadership currently sits with RAY, and market-cap leadership with RAY. Technical trend labels read bearish vs bearish, with RSI near 49.02/49.02. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, RAY or BAT?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. RAY leads on market cap today, while BAT leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, RAY or BAT?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both RAY and BAT.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. RAY currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is BAT, but longer windows can disagree.