Overview
PEPS ranks this pair inside the Top 300 market-cap universe. That means Shuffle and Railgun are liquid enough for an indexable comparison, with metrics refreshed on the hourly coin pipeline.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | SHFL | RAIL |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.286578 | $1.43 |
| Market Cap | $121.86M | $86.05M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $694,771.00 | $78,017.00 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 224.00 | 281.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | SHFL | RAIL |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -4.10% | +1.80% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | SHFL | RAIL |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 65.00 | 65.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Use the indicator table as a checklist: if momentum and trend align on one asset while the other diverges, relative-value setups become more interesting — still without certainty.
Fundamentals
| Metric | SHFL | RAIL |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Shuffle
Railgun
Pros and cons
Pros of Shuffle
- Composite PEPS readings for Shuffle can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Shuffle has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- Market-cap scale on Shuffle may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
Cons of Shuffle
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit Shuffle harder simply because it is more visible.
- When dominance narratives fade, Shuffle can lag hotter rotation names.
- Crowded positioning around SHFL sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Large-cap status for Shuffle can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
Pros of Railgun
- Narrative optionality around Railgun can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- Diversifying versus Shuffle with Railgun can change portfolio factor exposure.
- If technical momentum aligns, Railgun may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Active volume bursts on RAIL sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
Cons of Railgun
- Trend failures on Railgun often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave Railgun more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Relative underperformance versus Shuffle can persist through entire market regimes.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for Railgun.
Which looks stronger right now?
Statistically, higher market cap (Shuffle) often correlates with deeper books, while hotter 24h prints (Railgun) can fade. Position sizing should reflect that uncertainty.
AI summary
PEPS synthesizes module output into a readable pair brief. Headline stats put Shuffle at $0.286578 and Railgun at $1.43. Relative performance over 24h (Railgun) is a short window. Pair it with 30d/1y rows before inferring regime change. Return to related comparisons and individual coin intelligence pages to validate whether the relative story still holds after fresh prints.
FAQ
Which is better, Shuffle or Railgun?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Shuffle leads on market cap today, while Railgun leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, SHFL or RAIL?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Shuffle and Railgun.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Shuffle currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Railgun, but longer windows can disagree.