Overview
QNT (QNT) and Filecoin (FIL) sit at different layers of the crypto stack. At current prices ($60.35 vs $0.720200), market leadership still favors QNT on capitalization, while 24h tape is led by Filecoin.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | QNT | FIL |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $60.35 | $0.720200 |
| Market Cap | $875.64M | $562.65M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $756,741.89 | $3.96M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 72.00 | 91.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +5.67% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | QNT | FIL |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -2.19% | +1.11% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | QNT | FIL |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 42.21 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 0.04 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 24.60 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 0.67 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 0.82 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 67.00 | — |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, QNT shows RSI 49.02 with trend bias bearish, while Filecoin sits at RSI 42.21 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | QNT | FIL |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | 0.00 |
| Github activity | — | 0.00 |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
QNT
Filecoin
Pros and cons
Pros of QNT
- Composite PEPS readings for QNT can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- QNT has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- Market-cap scale on QNT may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- Higher ranking for QNT can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
Cons of QNT
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit QNT harder simply because it is more visible.
- When dominance narratives fade, QNT can lag hotter rotation names.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
Pros of Filecoin
- Active volume bursts on FIL sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- Filecoin can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
Cons of Filecoin
- Trend failures on Filecoin often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for Filecoin.
- Relative underperformance versus QNT can persist through entire market regimes.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave Filecoin more exposed to liquidity droughts.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to QNT, while short-term performance leans toward Filecoin. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: QNT (QNT) trades near $60.35 with a -2.19% day move, while Filecoin (FIL) is around $0.720200 (+1.11%). Volume leadership currently sits with Filecoin, and market-cap leadership with QNT. Technical trend labels read bearish vs bearish, with RSI near 49.02/42.21. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, QNT or Filecoin?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. QNT leads on market cap today, while Filecoin leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, QNT or FIL?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both QNT and Filecoin.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Filecoin currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Filecoin, but longer windows can disagree.