Overview
PEPS ranks this pair inside the Top 300 market-cap universe. That means Pump.fun and Jupiter are liquid enough for an indexable comparison, with metrics refreshed on the hourly coin pipeline.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | PUMP | JUP |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.002099 | $0.194906 |
| Market Cap | $831.03M | $647.36M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $72.17M | $19.81M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 76.00 | 87.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | PUMP | JUP |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -0.90% | +1.00% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | PUMP | JUP |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Use the indicator table as a checklist: if momentum and trend align on one asset while the other diverges, relative-value setups become more interesting — still without certainty.
Fundamentals
| Metric | PUMP | JUP |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Pump.fun
Jupiter
Pros and cons
Pros of Pump.fun
- PUMP often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- Composite PEPS readings for Pump.fun can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
Cons of Pump.fun
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- When dominance narratives fade, Pump.fun can lag hotter rotation names.
- Crowded positioning around PUMP sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
Pros of Jupiter
- Jupiter can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Narrative optionality around Jupiter can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- PEPS tracking for Jupiter still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
Cons of Jupiter
- Relative underperformance versus Pump.fun can persist through entire market regimes.
- Higher volatility on JUP cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Trend failures on Jupiter often travel faster than on more established assets.
Which looks stronger right now?
Statistically, higher market cap (Pump.fun) often correlates with deeper books, while hotter 24h prints (Jupiter) can fade. Position sizing should reflect that uncertainty.
AI summary
PEPS synthesizes module output into a readable pair brief. Headline stats put Pump.fun at $0.002099 and Jupiter at $0.194906. Relative performance over 24h (Jupiter) is a short window. Pair it with 30d/1y rows before inferring regime change. Return to related comparisons and individual coin intelligence pages to validate whether the relative story still holds after fresh prints.
FAQ
Which is better, Pump.fun or Jupiter?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Pump.fun leads on market cap today, while Jupiter leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, PUMP or JUP?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Pump.fun and Jupiter.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Pump.fun currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Jupiter, but longer windows can disagree.