Overview
GNO (GNO) and PENDLE (PENDLE) sit at different layers of the crypto stack. At current prices ($105.04 vs $1.39), market leadership still favors GNO on capitalization, while 24h tape is led by GNO.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | GNO | PENDLE |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $105.04 | $1.39 |
| Market Cap | $277.16M | $238.05M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $86,737.77 | $921,122.95 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 130.00 | 145.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | GNO | PENDLE |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +1.56% | +0.22% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | GNO | PENDLE |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Relative technical health favors reading both charts side by side. AI scores (58.20 vs 58.20) summarize PEPS modules, but supports and resistances still decide invalidation.
Fundamentals
| Metric | GNO | PENDLE |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
GNO
PENDLE
Pros and cons
Pros of GNO
- GNO typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- GNO has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- GNO often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
Cons of GNO
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- Crowded positioning around GNO sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit GNO harder simply because it is more visible.
Pros of PENDLE
- PENDLE can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- PEPS tracking for PENDLE still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- Active volume bursts on PENDLE sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
Cons of PENDLE
- Higher volatility on PENDLE cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for PENDLE.
- Relative underperformance versus GNO can persist through entire market regimes.
Which looks stronger right now?
If you weight capitalization and liquidity, GNO looks sturdier; if you weight 24h tape, GNO is ahead. A balanced view treats both as incomplete signals.
AI summary
Comparing GNO and PENDLE begins with structure: capitalization, volume and rank. Present prints are $105.04 versus $1.39. Momentum and trend can disagree with market-cap hierarchy. That is normal in crypto rotations and should be stress-tested against supports and news flow. Canonical URLs prevent duplicate PENDLE-vs-GNO pages, keeping SEO equity on one comparison. Keep monitoring winners as data updates.
FAQ
Which is better, GNO or PENDLE?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. GNO leads on market cap today, while GNO leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, GNO or PENDLE?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both GNO and PENDLE.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. PENDLE currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is GNO, but longer windows can disagree.