Overview
This page compares PENDLE and ATH with live PEPS metrics. Rankings (#145 vs #298) and liquidity profiles differ, so traders often use them for distinct roles rather than as perfect substitutes.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | PENDLE | ATH |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.37 | $1,861.70 |
| Market Cap | $234.90M | $76.88M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $988,809.35 | $5.39M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 145.00 | 298.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | PENDLE | ATH |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -2.07% | -2.00% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | PENDLE | ATH |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 65.00 | 65.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
When RSI and trend disagree across PENDLE and ATH, expect choppy relative performance until one side reclaims a clear structure.
Fundamentals
| Metric | PENDLE | ATH |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
PENDLE
ATH
Pros and cons
Pros of PENDLE
- Market-cap scale on PENDLE may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- PENDLE often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- Composite PEPS readings for PENDLE can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- PENDLE typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
Cons of PENDLE
- Indicator stacks on PENDLE may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- Large-cap status for PENDLE can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
Pros of ATH
- If technical momentum aligns, ATH may outperform on medium-term windows.
- ATH can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Diversifying versus PENDLE with ATH can change portfolio factor exposure.
- PEPS tracking for ATH still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
Cons of ATH
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave ATH more exposed to liquidity droughts.
Which looks stronger right now?
The “stronger” label here is descriptive, not predictive. PENDLE and ATH can alternate leadership as macro liquidity and narrative rotate.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. PENDLE holds market-cap $234.90M and rank #145; ATH shows $76.88M and #298. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch ATH. Where durability matters, watch PENDLE. AI composite scores (57.80/57.80) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, PENDLE or ATH?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. PENDLE leads on market cap today, while ATH leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, PENDLE or ATH?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both PENDLE and ATH.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. ATH currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is ATH, but longer windows can disagree.