Overview
This page compares GNO and Optimism with live PEPS metrics. Rankings (#130 vs #162) and liquidity profiles differ, so traders often use them for distinct roles rather than as perfect substitutes.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | GNO | OP |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $103.74 | $0.085600 |
| Market Cap | $274.29M | $216.56M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $72,889.41 | $1.73M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 130.00 | 162.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +5.69% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | GNO | OP |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -1.36% | +1.66% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | GNO | OP |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 38.40 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 0.00 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 22.35 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | — |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 0.10 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 64.00 | — |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for GNO/OP currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | GNO | OP |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | 0.00 |
| Github activity | — | 0.00 |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
GNO
Optimism
Pros and cons
Pros of GNO
- Market-cap scale on GNO may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- GNO has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
Cons of GNO
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- Indicator stacks on GNO may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- When dominance narratives fade, GNO can lag hotter rotation names.
Pros of Optimism
- PEPS tracking for Optimism still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- Active volume bursts on OP sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
Cons of Optimism
- Relative underperformance versus GNO can persist through entire market regimes.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave Optimism more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Higher volatility on OP cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for GNO on size and Optimism on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: GNO (GNO) trades near $103.74 with a -1.36% day move, while Optimism (OP) is around $0.085600 (+1.66%). Volume leadership currently sits with Optimism, and market-cap leadership with GNO. Technical trend labels read bearish vs bearish, with RSI near 54.31/38.40. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, GNO or Optimism?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. GNO leads on market cap today, while Optimism leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, GNO or OP?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both GNO and Optimism.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Optimism currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Optimism, but longer windows can disagree.