Overview
Investors searching USDY vs JUP usually want a clear market-cap and momentum snapshot. USDY prints $1,887.28 (+0.10%) while JUP is at $0.196700 (+1.76%), with volume edge currently on USDY.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | USDY | JUP |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,887.28 | $0.196700 |
| Market Cap | $2.15B | $652.12M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $1.92M | $1.57M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 40.00 | 86.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | USDY | JUP |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.10% | +1.76% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | USDY | JUP |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, USDY shows RSI 49.02 with trend bias bearish, while JUP sits at RSI 49.02 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | USDY | JUP |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
USDY
JUP
Pros and cons
Pros of USDY
- USDY often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- Composite PEPS readings for USDY can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
Cons of USDY
- Indicator stacks on USDY may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Large-cap status for USDY can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
Pros of JUP
- JUP can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Active volume bursts on JUP sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- PEPS tracking for JUP still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
Cons of JUP
- Higher volatility on JUP cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for JUP.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to USDY, while short-term performance leans toward JUP. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: USDY (USDY) trades near $1,887.28 with a +0.10% day move, while JUP (JUP) is around $0.196700 (+1.76%). Volume leadership currently sits with USDY, and market-cap leadership with USDY. Technical trend labels read bearish vs bearish, with RSI near 49.02/49.02. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, USDY or JUP?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. USDY leads on market cap today, while JUP leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, USDY or JUP?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both USDY and JUP.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. USDY currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is JUP, but longer windows can disagree.