Overview
This page compares USDY and Filecoin with live PEPS metrics. Rankings (#40 vs #90) and liquidity profiles differ, so traders often use them for distinct roles rather than as perfect substitutes.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | USDY | FIL |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,887.28 | $0.721200 |
| Market Cap | $2.15B | $562.65M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $1.92M | $4.23M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 40.00 | 90.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +5.67% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | USDY | FIL |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.10% | +2.87% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | USDY | FIL |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 42.21 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 0.04 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 24.60 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 0.67 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 0.82 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | — |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Use the indicator table as a checklist: if momentum and trend align on one asset while the other diverges, relative-value setups become more interesting — still without certainty.
Fundamentals
| Metric | USDY | FIL |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | 0.00 |
| Github activity | — | 0.00 |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
USDY
Filecoin
Pros and cons
Pros of USDY
- Composite PEPS readings for USDY can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Higher ranking for USDY can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- Market-cap scale on USDY may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
Cons of USDY
- Large-cap status for USDY can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit USDY harder simply because it is more visible.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
Pros of Filecoin
- Diversifying versus USDY with Filecoin can change portfolio factor exposure.
- PEPS tracking for Filecoin still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
Cons of Filecoin
- Trend failures on Filecoin often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for Filecoin.
- Relative underperformance versus USDY can persist through entire market regimes.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave Filecoin more exposed to liquidity droughts.
Which looks stronger right now?
Statistically, higher market cap (USDY) often correlates with deeper books, while hotter 24h prints (Filecoin) can fade. Position sizing should reflect that uncertainty.
AI summary
PEPS synthesizes module output into a readable pair brief. Headline stats put USDY at $1,887.28 and Filecoin at $0.721200. Relative performance over 24h (Filecoin) is a short window. Pair it with 30d/1y rows before inferring regime change. Return to related comparisons and individual coin intelligence pages to validate whether the relative story still holds after fresh prints.
FAQ
Which is better, USDY or Filecoin?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. USDY leads on market cap today, while Filecoin leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, USDY or FIL?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both USDY and Filecoin.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Filecoin currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Filecoin, but longer windows can disagree.