Overview
Whether you arrived from a “USDY vs Celestia” query or from PEPS coin pages, this hub aggregates ranks, performance and module-backed signals into one canonical URL.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | USDY | TIA |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,880.40 | $0.329600 |
| Market Cap | $2.15B | $322.88M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $2.16M | $915,221.58 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 40.00 | 121.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | USDY | TIA |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.20% | +2.77% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | USDY | TIA |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for USDY/TIA currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | USDY | TIA |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | 33.00 |
| Github activity | — | 994.00 |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
USDY
Celestia
Pros and cons
Pros of USDY
- Higher ranking for USDY can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- USDY has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- USDY often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
Cons of USDY
- Large-cap status for USDY can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit USDY harder simply because it is more visible.
- Indicator stacks on USDY may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
Pros of Celestia
- Narrative optionality around Celestia can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- Active volume bursts on TIA sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- If technical momentum aligns, Celestia may outperform on medium-term windows.
Cons of Celestia
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for Celestia.
- Higher volatility on TIA cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for USDY on size and USDY on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. USDY holds market-cap $2.15B and rank #40; Celestia shows $322.88M and #121. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch USDY. Where durability matters, watch USDY. AI composite scores (56.80/56.80) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, USDY or Celestia?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. USDY leads on market cap today, while Celestia leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, USDY or TIA?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both USDY and Celestia.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. USDY currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Celestia, but longer windows can disagree.