Overview
Whether you arrived from a “USDY vs Aptos” query or from PEPS coin pages, this hub aggregates ranks, performance and module-backed signals into one canonical URL.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | USDY | APT |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,861.70 | $0.569000 |
| Market Cap | $2.15B | $529.32M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $1.91M | $2.61M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 40.00 | 101.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +5.39% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | USDY | APT |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.00% | +2.15% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | USDY | APT |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 34.62 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 0.03 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 28.06 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | — |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 0.64 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 65.00 | — |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
When RSI and trend disagree across USDY and Aptos, expect choppy relative performance until one side reclaims a clear structure.
Fundamentals
| Metric | USDY | APT |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | 0.00 |
| Github activity | — | 0.00 |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
USDY
Aptos
Pros and cons
Pros of USDY
- USDY has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- Higher ranking for USDY can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- USDY often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
Cons of USDY
- Large-cap status for USDY can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- When dominance narratives fade, USDY can lag hotter rotation names.
- Indicator stacks on USDY may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
Pros of Aptos
- Narrative optionality around Aptos can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- Diversifying versus USDY with Aptos can change portfolio factor exposure.
- If technical momentum aligns, Aptos may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Active volume bursts on APT sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
Cons of Aptos
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave Aptos more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Trend failures on Aptos often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Higher volatility on APT cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for Aptos.
Which looks stronger right now?
The “stronger” label here is descriptive, not predictive. USDY and Aptos can alternate leadership as macro liquidity and narrative rotate.
AI summary
Comparing USDY and APT begins with structure: capitalization, volume and rank. Present prints are $1,861.70 versus $0.569000. Momentum and trend can disagree with market-cap hierarchy. That is normal in crypto rotations and should be stress-tested against supports and news flow. Canonical URLs prevent duplicate APT-vs-USDY pages, keeping SEO equity on one comparison. Keep monitoring winners as data updates.
FAQ
Which is better, USDY or Aptos?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. USDY leads on market cap today, while Aptos leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, USDY or APT?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both USDY and Aptos.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Aptos currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Aptos, but longer windows can disagree.