Overview
Whether you arrived from a “OHM vs NEO” query or from PEPS coin pages, this hub aggregates ranks, performance and module-backed signals into one canonical URL.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | OHM | NEO |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,853.59 | $1.82 |
| Market Cap | $277.54M | $128.45M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $102,638.00 | $124,245.77 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 128.00 | 217.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | OHM | NEO |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -0.20% | -0.66% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | OHM | NEO |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 67.00 | 67.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
When RSI and trend disagree across OHM and NEO, expect choppy relative performance until one side reclaims a clear structure.
Fundamentals
| Metric | OHM | NEO |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
OHM
NEO
Pros and cons
Pros of OHM
- Composite PEPS readings for OHM can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- OHM often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
Cons of OHM
- Large-cap status for OHM can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit OHM harder simply because it is more visible.
- Crowded positioning around OHM sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
Pros of NEO
- Active volume bursts on NEO sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- Diversifying versus OHM with NEO can change portfolio factor exposure.
- If technical momentum aligns, NEO may outperform on medium-term windows.
Cons of NEO
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave NEO more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Trend failures on NEO often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
Which looks stronger right now?
The “stronger” label here is descriptive, not predictive. OHM and NEO can alternate leadership as macro liquidity and narrative rotate.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. OHM holds market-cap $277.54M and rank #128; NEO shows $128.45M and #217. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch NEO. Where durability matters, watch OHM. AI composite scores (57.90/57.90) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, OHM or NEO?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. OHM leads on market cap today, while OHM leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, OHM or NEO?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both OHM and NEO.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. NEO currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is OHM, but longer windows can disagree.