Overview
PEPS ranks this pair inside the Top 300 market-cap universe. That means Convex Finance and NEO are liquid enough for an indexable comparison, with metrics refreshed on the hourly coin pipeline.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | CVX | NEO |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.29 | $1.81 |
| Market Cap | $129.26M | $127.58M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $2.41M | $2.35M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 227.00 | 214.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | CVX | NEO |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.70% | -0.90% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | CVX | NEO |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 60.00 | 60.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for CVX/NEO currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | CVX | NEO |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Convex Finance
NEO
Pros and cons
Pros of Convex Finance
- Convex Finance typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
- Market-cap scale on Convex Finance may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- Higher ranking for Convex Finance can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- CVX often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
Cons of Convex Finance
- Crowded positioning around CVX sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Large-cap status for Convex Finance can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Indicator stacks on Convex Finance may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
Pros of NEO
- NEO can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- PEPS tracking for NEO still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- Narrative optionality around NEO can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
Cons of NEO
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for NEO.
- Higher volatility on NEO cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for Convex Finance on size and Convex Finance on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: Convex Finance (CVX) trades near $1.29 with a +0.70% day move, while NEO (NEO) is around $1.81 (-0.90%). Volume leadership currently sits with Convex Finance, and market-cap leadership with Convex Finance. Technical trend labels read bearish vs bearish, with RSI near 54.31/54.31. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, Convex Finance or NEO?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Convex Finance leads on market cap today, while Convex Finance leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, CVX or NEO?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Convex Finance and NEO.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Convex Finance currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Convex Finance, but longer windows can disagree.