Overview
Investors searching JST vs ATH usually want a clear market-cap and momentum snapshot. JST prints $0.105840 (+1.65%) while ATH is at $1,867.53 (-2.70%), with volume edge currently on ATH.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | JST | ATH |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.105840 | $1,867.53 |
| Market Cap | $865.23M | $77.21M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $1.47M | $5.27M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 74.00 | 298.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | JST | ATH |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +1.65% | -2.70% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | JST | ATH |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 65.00 | 65.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Automated technical notes for this pair highlight bearish conditions on JST and bearish on ATH. Volatility differences can amplify short-term gaps.
Fundamentals
| Metric | JST | ATH |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
JST
ATH
Pros and cons
Pros of JST
- JST has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- Composite PEPS readings for JST can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- JST often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
Cons of JST
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit JST harder simply because it is more visible.
- Large-cap status for JST can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Indicator stacks on JST may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- When dominance narratives fade, JST can lag hotter rotation names.
Pros of ATH
- Active volume bursts on ATH sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- If technical momentum aligns, ATH may outperform on medium-term windows.
Cons of ATH
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for ATH.
- Trend failures on ATH often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Relative underperformance versus JST can persist through entire market regimes.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave ATH more exposed to liquidity droughts.
Which looks stronger right now?
Across winners above, no single coin dominates every column. Prefer scenarios: trend continuation favors the side with aligned momentum; mean-reversion favors the side stretched on RSI.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. JST holds market-cap $865.23M and rank #74; ATH shows $77.21M and #298. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch ATH. Where durability matters, watch JST. AI composite scores (57.90/57.90) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, JST or ATH?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. JST leads on market cap today, while JST leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, JST or ATH?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both JST and ATH.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. ATH currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is JST, but longer windows can disagree.