Overview
Whether you arrived from a “JUP vs OHM” query or from PEPS coin pages, this hub aggregates ranks, performance and module-backed signals into one canonical URL.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | JUP | OHM |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.194700 | $1,880.40 |
| Market Cap | $647.36M | $279.67M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $1.62M | $89,049.00 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 87.00 | 128.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | JUP | OHM |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.83% | +0.90% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | JUP | OHM |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for JUP/OHM currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | JUP | OHM |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
JUP
OHM
Pros and cons
Pros of JUP
- JUP has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- Composite PEPS readings for JUP can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- JUP often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- Higher ranking for JUP can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
Cons of JUP
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit JUP harder simply because it is more visible.
- When dominance narratives fade, JUP can lag hotter rotation names.
- Crowded positioning around JUP sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- Large-cap status for JUP can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
Pros of OHM
- Active volume bursts on OHM sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- Narrative optionality around OHM can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- If technical momentum aligns, OHM may outperform on medium-term windows.
- Diversifying versus JUP with OHM can change portfolio factor exposure.
Cons of OHM
- Trend failures on OHM often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for OHM.
- Relative underperformance versus JUP can persist through entire market regimes.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave OHM more exposed to liquidity droughts.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for JUP on size and JUP on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. JUP holds market-cap $647.36M and rank #87; OHM shows $279.67M and #128. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch JUP. Where durability matters, watch JUP. AI composite scores (56.80/56.80) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, JUP or OHM?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. JUP leads on market cap today, while OHM leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, JUP or OHM?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both JUP and OHM.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. JUP currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is OHM, but longer windows can disagree.