Overview
From a portfolio lens, JUP ($646.62M) and IOTA ($154.94M) offer different beta to bitcoin cycles. The overview below keeps the facts first and the narrative second.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | JUP | IOTA |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.194400 | $0.033927 |
| Market Cap | $646.62M | $154.94M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $1.65M | $4.73M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 87.00 | 193.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | JUP | IOTA |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.36% | +4.50% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | JUP | IOTA |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 59.00 | 59.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, JUP shows RSI 54.31 with trend bias bearish, while IOTA sits at RSI 54.31 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | JUP | IOTA |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
JUP
IOTA
Pros and cons
Pros of JUP
- Higher ranking for JUP can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- JUP has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
- Market-cap scale on JUP may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
Cons of JUP
- Large-cap status for JUP can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- When dominance narratives fade, JUP can lag hotter rotation names.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
Pros of IOTA
- Active volume bursts on IOTA sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- Narrative optionality around IOTA can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- PEPS tracking for IOTA still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- Diversifying versus JUP with IOTA can change portfolio factor exposure.
Cons of IOTA
- Trend failures on IOTA often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Higher volatility on IOTA cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave IOTA more exposed to liquidity droughts.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to JUP, while short-term performance leans toward IOTA. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
In about three hundred words of context: JUP (JUP) trades near $0.194400 with a +0.36% day move, while IOTA (IOTA) is around $0.033927 (+4.50%). Volume leadership currently sits with IOTA, and market-cap leadership with JUP. Technical trend labels read bearish vs bearish, with RSI near 54.31/54.31. Bottom line: use this page as a structured checklist, then open each coin page and related PEPS tools before acting. Nothing here is financial advice.
FAQ
Which is better, JUP or IOTA?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. JUP leads on market cap today, while IOTA leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, JUP or IOTA?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both JUP and IOTA.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. IOTA currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is IOTA, but longer windows can disagree.