Overview
PEPS ranks this pair inside the Top 300 market-cap universe. That means IOTA and SHFL are liquid enough for an indexable comparison, with metrics refreshed on the hourly coin pipeline.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | IOTA | SHFL |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.033100 | $1,856.75 |
| Market Cap | $151.20M | $127.09M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $174,871.81 | $525,112.00 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 194.00 | 217.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | IOTA | SHFL |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +1.53% | -1.10% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | IOTA | SHFL |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 67.00 | 67.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Indicator stacks for IOTA/SHFL currently lean on separate regimes: bearish versus bearish. Treat MACD and RSI as context, not as standalone entry triggers.
Fundamentals
| Metric | IOTA | SHFL |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
IOTA
SHFL
Pros and cons
Pros of IOTA
- Composite PEPS readings for IOTA can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- IOTA often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- IOTA has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
Cons of IOTA
- Large-cap status for IOTA can mean slower percentage upside versus high-beta alternatives.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit IOTA harder simply because it is more visible.
- Crowded positioning around IOTA sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
- When dominance narratives fade, IOTA can lag hotter rotation names.
Pros of SHFL
- Narrative optionality around SHFL can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
- PEPS tracking for SHFL still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- Active volume bursts on SHFL sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
Cons of SHFL
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for SHFL.
- Relative underperformance versus IOTA can persist through entire market regimes.
Which looks stronger right now?
Data currently points to a probabilistic edge for IOTA on size and SHFL on activity. Neither reading guarantees future returns.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. IOTA holds market-cap $151.20M and rank #194; SHFL shows $127.09M and #217. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch SHFL. Where durability matters, watch IOTA. AI composite scores (57.90/57.90) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, IOTA or SHFL?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. IOTA leads on market cap today, while IOTA leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, IOTA or SHFL?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both IOTA and SHFL.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. SHFL currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is IOTA, but longer windows can disagree.