Overview
Sei vs IOTA is one of the most watched crypto matchups. Beyond headline prices, this comparison blends market structure, technical readings and probabilistic context without promising outcomes.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | SEI | IOTA |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.041370 | $0.033600 |
| Market Cap | $301.91M | $153.51M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $795,465.27 | $174,010.36 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 129.00 | 193.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | SEI | IOTA |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +1.25% | +4.35% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | SEI | IOTA |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 63.00 | 63.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Use the indicator table as a checklist: if momentum and trend align on one asset while the other diverges, relative-value setups become more interesting — still without certainty.
Fundamentals
| Metric | SEI | IOTA |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | 0.00 | — |
| Github activity | 0.00 | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Sei
IOTA
Pros and cons
Pros of Sei
- Composite PEPS readings for Sei can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Market-cap scale on Sei may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- Sei has an established coin page footprint on PEPS for continuous monitoring.
Cons of Sei
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit Sei harder simply because it is more visible.
- When dominance narratives fade, Sei can lag hotter rotation names.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
Pros of IOTA
- Active volume bursts on IOTA sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- PEPS tracking for IOTA still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- Diversifying versus Sei with IOTA can change portfolio factor exposure.
Cons of IOTA
- Trend failures on IOTA often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Higher volatility on IOTA cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave IOTA more exposed to liquidity droughts.
Which looks stronger right now?
Statistically, higher market cap (Sei) often correlates with deeper books, while hotter 24h prints (IOTA) can fade. Position sizing should reflect that uncertainty.
AI summary
For readers asking which is “better”, the honest answer is conditional. Sei and IOTA solve overlapping but not identical market jobs. On-chain and developer fields, when available, add slower-moving context beneath the tape. Missing fundamentals should be treated as unknown, not as zeros. If your thesis is long-term adoption, weight fundamentals and liquidity; if tactical, weight trend/momentum — and always define invalidation.
FAQ
Which is better, Sei or IOTA?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Sei leads on market cap today, while IOTA leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, SEI or IOTA?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Sei and IOTA.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Sei currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is IOTA, but longer windows can disagree.