Overview
Whether you arrived from a “BUIDL vs IOTA” query or from PEPS coin pages, this hub aggregates ranks, performance and module-backed signals into one canonical URL.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | BUIDL | IOTA |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,855.02 | $0.032800 |
| Market Cap | $2.70B | $150.30M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $0.000000 | $246,065.08 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 35.00 | 192.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.50% | +3.50% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | BUIDL | IOTA |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | +0.00% | +0.00% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | BUIDL | IOTA |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.31 | 54.31 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 66.45 | 66.45 |
| ADX | 20.44 | 20.44 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 64.00 | 64.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
When RSI and trend disagree across BUIDL and IOTA, expect choppy relative performance until one side reclaims a clear structure.
Fundamentals
| Metric | BUIDL | IOTA |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
BUIDL
IOTA
Pros and cons
Pros of BUIDL
- Higher ranking for BUIDL can translate into tighter spreads on major venues.
- Composite PEPS readings for BUIDL can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- Market-cap scale on BUIDL may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
Cons of BUIDL
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit BUIDL harder simply because it is more visible.
- When dominance narratives fade, BUIDL can lag hotter rotation names.
- Indicator stacks on BUIDL may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
Pros of IOTA
- Active volume bursts on IOTA sometimes precede sharper tactical moves.
- IOTA can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Diversifying versus BUIDL with IOTA can change portfolio factor exposure.
Cons of IOTA
- Smaller book depth versus large caps can increase slippage for IOTA.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave IOTA more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
Which looks stronger right now?
The “stronger” label here is descriptive, not predictive. BUIDL and IOTA can alternate leadership as macro liquidity and narrative rotate.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. BUIDL holds market-cap $2.70B and rank #35; IOTA shows $150.30M and #192. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch IOTA. Where durability matters, watch BUIDL. AI composite scores (57.00/57.00) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, BUIDL or IOTA?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. BUIDL leads on market cap today, while BUIDL / IOTA leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, BUIDL or IOTA?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both BUIDL and IOTA.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. IOTA currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is BUIDL / IOTA, but longer windows can disagree.