Overview
From a portfolio lens, Provenance Blockchain ($441.51M) and Unibase ($394.63M) offer different beta to bitcoin cycles. The overview below keeps the facts first and the narrative second.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | HASH | UB |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.007883 | $0.156748 |
| Market Cap | $441.51M | $394.63M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $2,881.54 | $23.07M |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 105.00 | 108.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | HASH | UB |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -9.70% | -1.30% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | HASH | UB |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 67.00 | 67.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Automated technical notes for this pair highlight bearish conditions on HASH and bearish on UB. Volatility differences can amplify short-term gaps.
Fundamentals
| Metric | HASH | UB |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
Provenance Blockchain
Unibase
Pros and cons
Pros of Provenance Blockchain
- HASH often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- Composite PEPS readings for Provenance Blockchain can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
Cons of Provenance Blockchain
- Indicator stacks on Provenance Blockchain may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- When dominance narratives fade, Provenance Blockchain can lag hotter rotation names.
- Crowded positioning around HASH sometimes amplifies squeeze or flush risk.
Pros of Unibase
- Unibase can offer higher relative beta when market attention rotates toward its niche.
- Narrative optionality around Unibase can reprice quickly when catalysts appear.
Cons of Unibase
- Relative underperformance versus Provenance Blockchain can persist through entire market regimes.
- Higher volatility on UB cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
- Trend failures on Unibase often travel faster than on more established assets.
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
Which looks stronger right now?
Across winners above, no single coin dominates every column. Prefer scenarios: trend continuation favors the side with aligned momentum; mean-reversion favors the side stretched on RSI.
AI summary
This AI-assisted summary starts from live PEPS fields. Provenance Blockchain holds market-cap $441.51M and rank #105; Unibase shows $394.63M and #108. Where liquidity and flow matter, watch Unibase. Where durability matters, watch Provenance Blockchain. AI composite scores (57.90/57.90) compress those tensions into a single lens. In probabilistic terms, the side winning more columns may have a nearer-term edge, but tails remain fat. Revisit after the next hourly refresh.
FAQ
Which is better, Provenance Blockchain or Unibase?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. Provenance Blockchain leads on market cap today, while Unibase leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, HASH or UB?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both Provenance Blockchain and Unibase.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. Unibase currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is Unibase, but longer windows can disagree.