Overview
From a portfolio lens, HASH ($444.65M) and APE ($130.96M) offer different beta to bitcoin cycles. The overview below keeps the facts first and the narrative second.
Quick winners
Full comparison
| Metric | HASH | APE |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,853.59 | $0.130900 |
| Market Cap | $444.65M | $130.96M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Volume 24h | $3,042.49 | $446,846.70 |
| Circulating Supply | — | — |
| Total Supply | — | — |
| Max Supply | — | — |
| Rank | 105.00 | 212.00 |
| Dominance | — | — |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| Volatility | +3.64% | +3.64% |
| ATH | — | — |
| ATL | — | — |
| ROI | — | — |
Performance
| Timeframe | HASH | APE |
|---|---|---|
| 1H | — | — |
| 24H | -7.00% | -0.83% |
| 7D | — | — |
| 30D | — | — |
| 90D | — | — |
| 1Y | — | — |
| YTD | — | — |
| ALL | — | — |
Comparative chart
Technical indicators
| Indicator | HASH | APE |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 49.02 | 49.02 |
| MACD histogram | — | — |
| EMA20 | — | — |
| EMA50 | — | — |
| EMA100 | — | — |
| EMA200 | — | — |
| SMA50 | — | — |
| SMA200 | — | — |
| ATR | 67.35 | 67.35 |
| ADX | 21.33 | 21.33 |
| Support | 1,827.82 | 1,827.82 |
| Resistance | 1,960.30 | 1,960.30 |
| Trend | bearish | bearish |
| Momentum | 67.00 | 67.00 |
| Signal | neutral | neutral |
Automatic technical analysis
Technically, HASH shows RSI 49.02 with trend bias bearish, while APE sits at RSI 49.02 (bearish). Divergences between momentum and price should be confirmed on higher timeframes.
Fundamentals
| Metric | HASH | APE |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus | — | — |
| Blockchain | — | — |
| TPS | — | — |
| Block time | — | — |
| Finality | — | — |
| Validators | — | — |
| Staking | — | — |
| TVL | — | — |
| Supply model | — | — |
| Inflation | — | — |
| Developer activity | — | — |
| Github activity | — | — |
| On-chain activity | — | — |
| Whale activity | — | — |
| Addresses | — | — |
| Gas fees | — | — |
Ecosystem
HASH
APE
Pros and cons
Pros of HASH
- HASH often anchors narratives that attract sustained media and analyst coverage.
- Market-cap scale on HASH may dampen some idiosyncratic shocks versus smaller peers.
- Composite PEPS readings for HASH can surface clearer module agreement during trend phases.
- HASH typically benefits from deeper liquidity and broader market recognition inside the Top 300 set.
Cons of HASH
- Data gaps in niche fundamentals still apply — absence of a field is not confirmation.
- Regulatory or macro headlines can hit HASH harder simply because it is more visible.
- Indicator stacks on HASH may stay stretched longer than expected in strong trends.
Pros of APE
- PEPS tracking for APE still includes AI score and level context for monitoring.
- Diversifying versus HASH with APE can change portfolio factor exposure.
Cons of APE
- Incomplete fundamental coverage can hide operational or tokenomic risks.
- Relative underperformance versus HASH can persist through entire market regimes.
- Weaker market-cap standing may leave APE more exposed to liquidity droughts.
- Higher volatility on APE cuts both ways and demands stricter risk limits.
Which looks stronger right now?
On the latest snapshot, market-cap leadership belongs to HASH, while short-term performance leans toward APE. That mix suggests relative strength can flip quickly, so size risk accordingly.
AI summary
Comparing HASH and APE begins with structure: capitalization, volume and rank. Present prints are $1,853.59 versus $0.130900. Momentum and trend can disagree with market-cap hierarchy. That is normal in crypto rotations and should be stress-tested against supports and news flow. Canonical URLs prevent duplicate APE-vs-HASH pages, keeping SEO equity on one comparison. Keep monitoring winners as data updates.
FAQ
Which is better, HASH or APE?
“Better” depends on horizon and risk. HASH leads on market cap today, while APE leads the 24h move — neither is a guarantee.
Which has more upside potential, HASH or APE?
Higher-beta assets can move more in both directions. Use performance tables and volatility, not headlines, to judge potential ranges.
Which is less risky right now?
Lower volatility and deeper liquidity usually imply milder path risk, but crypto tails remain large for both HASH and APE.
Which has stronger developer activity?
Check the fundamentals table for developer/github fields when populated. Missing values mean the feed has no reliable reading yet.
Which looks more decentralized?
Decentralization is multi-dimensional (validators, client diversity, token distribution). This page surfaces available consensus/validator fields without over-claiming.
Which has lower fees?
Fee comparisons belong to each network’s fee market. Where gas/fee metrics exist in fundamentals, compare them; otherwise verify on explorers.
Which is better for investing?
Investing choices need personal constraints. Use this comparison as research input, then size positions with an explicit invalidation plan.
Which is better for staking?
If staking fields are present, compare yield mechanics and lockups off-platform. Staking returns are not risk-free.
Which is more used day to day?
Volume, on-chain activity and ecosystem links are practical usage proxies. APE currently leads traded volume on this snapshot.
Which has the better recent performance?
See the performance table across 1h through 1y. The 24h leader is APE, but longer windows can disagree.